The relationship between the contents, metabolites, barrier and immune response of the gut and organs and function in the body are becoming well understood, albeit there are many nuances associated with this relationship yet to be quantified.
One area in which the dynamic interaction between the gut and a specific organ is rapidly rising up the knowledge tree is the ‘gut and liver axis’. In large part this is due to the increase in the prevalence of liver related inflammation, of which non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming a global problem. For with the global rise of obesity and the associated metabolic syndrome, there has been an equally alarming and related rise in the incidence of NAFLD and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) – the hepatic manifestations of the metabolic syndrome and the predominant chronic liver diseases worldwide
The spectrum ranges from simple hepatic steatosis, commonly associated with obesity, to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which can progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD pathophysiology is understood to involve a mix of environmental, physical, genetic and metabolic factors, as well as changes in the intestinal microbiota and their by-products.
The term ‘gut-liver axis’ is not new, having been first described by Volta et al in 1978, when these researchers reported production of immunoglobulin A antibodies to dietary antigens in patients with liver cirrhosis indicating interactions between gut and liver.
But the liver is unique, in its supply of blood in that it has two sources; from the hepatic artery and portal vein. Some 70%–75% of the liver’s blood supply is derived from the portal vein, which drains blood from mesenteric veins of the intestinal tract. This means that nutrients such as monosaccharides and amino acids are absorbed by specialised transporters on enterocytes and can reach the liver through the portal vein, where many are taken up by the liver cells – hepatocytes and then metabolised.
If the gut barrier is disrupted and contents entering the submucosa are problematic, the liver is the first organ in the body that encounters these which include microbial products, toxins and microorganisms (such as bacteria and fungi) from the intestine. The liver therefore serves as a large collection base for compounds and substances originating from the intestine and as such has to respond.
Barrier dysfunction also adds to the metabolic challenge as gut barrier dysfunction results in translocation of secreted metabolites and other microbial products from the gut lumen into blood and lymphatics. However, not all people with fatty livers have increased permeability but studies suggest about 40% do, suggesting its role in the development of NAFLD is not essential but is clinically relevant. But the metabolic components linked to altered bacterial composition and diet derived substrates are increasing seen as being instrumental in the generation and progression of NAFLD. Microbe-derived metabolites, such as trimethylamine, some secondary bile acids, short-chain fatty acids and ethanol appear likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Additional microbial metabolites that may be important in NAFLD/NASH include short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bile acids. The production of SCFAs (i.e. acetate, butyrate, propionate) occurs via microbial fermentation of complex dietary carbohydrates. Butyrate provides an energy source for the colonic epithelium, while acetate and propionate can serve as substrates for lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis, contributing to obesity and the development of NAFLD/NASH
Hence changing the metabolic output from the disordered microbiota is a clinically useful adjunctive intervention along with other strategic lifestyle interventions and supplements to prevent or reverse NAFLD. For, if dysbiosis is associated with the development of NAFLD/NASH, modulation of the gut microbiota to reverse dysbiosis may potentially alter disease course, hence gut microbiota are increasingly regarded as a novel therapeutic target for NAFLD by manipulating them in various ways, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, faecal microbiota transplantation, and herbal components.
Probiotics studied to date include lactic acid and bifido bacteria in which strain specific bacteria have been tested, however, whilst improvements in numerous parameters are recorded there is inconsistency – suggesting that the use of a probiotic alone is unlikely to be adequate and that diet, nutraceuticals and exercise changes as well as specific prebiotic foods will be needed.
 Luther J, Garber JJ, Khalili H, Dave M, Bale SS, Jindal R, Motola DL, Luther S, Bohr S, Jeoung SW, Deshpande V, Singh G, Turner JR, Yarmush ML, Chung RT, Patel SJ. Hepatic Injury in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Contributes to Altered Intestinal Permeability. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;1(2):222-232. View Full Paper